I never really paid much attention to her in the past. Her claim to fame, or whatever it is she has a claim to, is cherry-picking bits of information in an effort to prove there is no consensus amongst scientists on global climate change. In scientific circles she garners a great deal of laughter.
Her initial offerings slammed Quebecor and Kory Teneycke for, as M.J. calls it, seducing and abandoning her. Her latest one makes a big deal about how Avaaz, (and possibly a heavily armed Margaret Atwood), crushed the defenceless right-wingers of SunTV.
No mention is made of the activities of Kory Teneycke and the strong allegation that he was either party to or had knowledge aforethought of a criminal act of fraud. (Back to that cherry-picking thing Donna is apparently so good at.)
Who knows how good she would have been at twisting facts on SunTV. I personally think she would have been marvelous.
But if Canadian cable providers have been obliged, for the past decade, to offer a channel serving the 10% of the population that is homosexual why should a station serving the 50% of the population that votes conservative not receive an equivalent deal?Holy frack! How many?!!
No wonder people laugh at her. In the last election less than 26% of the population voted Conservative. In fact, no political party received 50% of the vote.
You couldn't get 50% of Canadians to vote in a single block for anything except maybe oral sex, but that's on another channel.
I am rather saddened that we won't get to see her on SunTV. What a great target!