Tuesday, March 06, 2012
Here come de bus
(That's not a threat of any kind, Vic. That's merely an observation based on your blatant hypocrisy, your poor judgement and your previously admitted lack of interest in things important).
If I were you, I'd get off the road quickly. Someone in your own party is about to shove you under that oncoming bus.
After that, they'll praise your rotting carcass on the altar of Conservative martydom.
Your own party is panicking. They need to sacrifice something big. I think you're it.
They have more on you than you have on them.
Monday, February 20, 2012
The Vancouver police "heart" Vic Toews
The Vancouver police department announced Monday its support for federal cybercrime legislation that critics say would give police extensive access to information about your activities on the Internet.
Vancouver police Deputy Chief Warren Lemcke, who is also co-chair of the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police Law Amendments Committee, blamed “misinformation” for a growing wave of protest against Bill C-30, which was introduced in Ottawa last week.
“We believe the new legislation will assist the police with the necessary tools to investigate crimes while balancing, if not strengthening the privacy rights for Canadians through the addition of oversight not currently in place,” Lemcke told a news conference. “It will help law enforcement investigate and apprehend those who are involved in criminal activity while using new technologies to avoid apprehension due to outdated laws and technology.”
“It will allow for timely and consistent access to basic information to assist in investigations of criminal activity and other police duties in serving the public.”
Oh, where to start?
Fourteen Vancouver police officers and one civilian staff member have been reprimanded for circulating pornography on work computers, the force announced on Thursday morning.
Saturday, February 18, 2012
Dots
This dot, then to this dot, then to this dot.
And off in the periphery Vic Toews, under the guise of administering "public safety" has you expecting to believe a great many things which, when held to the light, are unbelievable.
Also too, he's claiming he wasn't aware of the provisions of section 17 of Bill C-30. And now he's making himself out to be a victim.
We touch the side of our nose.
The most dangerous legislation ever placed before Parliament
Toews had (and still has) every intention of sending "inspectors" into your Internet Service Provider to dig up anything and everything without need for reasonable suspicion of a crime and without a warrant. Child pornography has nothing to do with it as evidenced by the lack of such definition anywhere in Bill C-30.
Terry Milewski has identified the portions of the proposed legislation which are most egregious and which so violate the norm of decency in a democratic country as to be near treasonous.
But, then, there's Section 34. After reading it, you wonder whether it's just pandas we're getting from China.
Among other things, the bill requires ISPs to install surveillance technology and software to enable monitoring of phone and internet traffic. Section 34 is there to make sure ISPs comply. So what, exactly, does it say?
Essentially, it says that government agents may enter an ISP when they wish, without a warrant, and demand to see absolutely everything — including all data anywhere on the network — and to copy it all. If that seems hard to believe, let's walk through it.
First, Section 33 tells us that, "The Minister may designate persons or classes of persons as inspectors for the purposes of the administration and enforcement of this Act." So we're not talking about police officers necessarily. We're talking about anyone the minister chooses — or any class of persons. (Musicians? Left-handed hockey players? Members of the Conservative Party? Sure, that's absurd — but the bill allows it...)
Next, Section 34 spells out the sweeping powers of these "inspectors." And, if they sound Orwellian, welcome to the world of Section 34.
The inspectors may "enter any place owned by, or under the control of, any telecommunications service provider in which the inspector has reasonable grounds to believe there is any document, information, transmission apparatus, telecommunications facility or any other thing to which this Act applies."
And, once he or she is in, anything goes.
The inspector, says the bill, may "examine any document, information or thing found in the place and open or cause to be opened any container or other thing." He or she may also "use, or cause to be used, any computer system in the place to search and examine any information contained in or available to the system."
You read that right. The inspector gets to see "any" information that's in or "available to the system." Yours, mine, and everyone else's emails, phone calls, web surfing, shopping, you name it. But, if that sounds breath-taking enough, don't quit now because the section is still not done.
The inspector — remember, this is anyone the minister chooses — is also empowered to copy anything that strikes his or her fancy. The inspector may "reproduce, or cause to be reproduced, any information in the form of a printout, or other intelligible output, and remove the printout, or other output, for examination or copying."
Oh, and he can even use the ISP's own computers and connections to copy it or to email it to himself. He can "use, or cause to be used, any copying equipment or means of telecommunication at the place."
In short, there's nothing the inspector cannot see or copy. "Any" information is up for grabs. And you thought the new airport body scanners were intrusive?Read it all. I mean it.
Vic Toews was (and still is) intent on becoming nothing short of Reichsleiter fur die Internet, or at least, appointing one. Remember what this bunch has already done.
And if you don't like the outright linkage to Nazi Germany you can go stand with Vic Toews.
More at DAMMIT JANET!
Friday, February 17, 2012
Investigate what?
In short, Toews is a typical conservative authoritarian. He won't be happy until you're all curled up in a ball and he's putting the boots to you.
The point, however, is the crap produced by the Ottawa Citizen.
An IP address connected to what is known as the Vikileaks30 Twitter account originates within the House of Commons.
In a bid to determine the origin of the account, which details personal information about Public Safety Minister Vic Toews, The Citizen undertook an investigation on Thursday.
An email was sent to the writer of the Vikileaks30 Twitter account, containing a link to a website. The website was monitored by The Citizen and only the author of Vikileaks30 had the address of the website.
About 15 minutes after the email was sent, Vikileaks30 opened the link and visited the page, leaving behind an IP address that belongs to the House of Commons.
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
How do we prevent that from happening here?
I remember taking something of a thrashing for even suggesting that Harper and his coalition of degenerates were the most dangerous group to have ever occupied the precincts of federal government in this country. Not just from right-wingers, whom I dismiss out of hand, but from a colourful bouquet of politically-aware people who refused to believe that the people of this country could be forced down a path which would tear the fabric of this country to shreds.
So, what prompted this?
Well, for one thing, this. And it's only just begun.
What about that title, you ask?
Yes, well consider this: extremist governments, right-wing or otherwise, do not survive in an atmosphere of honesty and transparency. When persuasion and propaganda do not succeed in bringing the masses around to support the extremist view, they resort to other means. In short, they build an apparatus of "laws" and "enforcement" to control and suppress opposition to their ideology and grip on power.
The title?
Someone among the battalions of people now surrounding Harper's hillbilly government, while watching something unfold before the world, saw something terrifying. It was people with access to communications which, even mildly unfettered, gave them power. And, aware that their so-called "majority" would actually collapse if a real majority of people woke up and actually went to the polls, asked the question.
How do we prevent that from happening here?
Thursday, August 19, 2010
The exclusionist rhetoric of Toews
Having been influenced by the social concerns articulated by leaders in the social democratic movement and by my late father, Reverend Victor Toews, a minister of the Mennonite Brethren Church in Rossmere, my political philosophies may not square in all respects with what political scientists consider to be within the mainstream of Progressive Conservatism.Anyone could presume that what Toews meant by that was that he was less right-wing than the average conservative - something which, as demonstrated by his actions, would have been a mistake. In that same speech, he also said this:
In 1990 I ran as the Progressive Conservative candidate in Elmwood, which was subsequently won by the current member. I then pursued a career in the private sector and was later approached to run in the constituency of Rossmere, which is, in my opinion, the most unique constituency in the province. It is the people and the community within its boundaries which set it apart.Interesting. Especially the linkage Toews makes between himself and the Mennonite post-WW2 immigration. You see, in the groups he mentions, most were refugees. While the war in Europe had ended there was a massive resettlement problem. The Mennonites were essentially ethnic Germans who had been displaced from their Russian homes by the fighting. During the war they had migrated out of Russia and into Germany. While they did not necessarily sympathize with the government of Adolf Hitler, the doctrine adopted by the largely pacifist Mennonite community was one of non-resistance. A good number of the men ended up inducted into the German armed forces. There was no place for them in a post-war devastated Germany and to go back to Russia was a likely death-sentence.
It is populated by two major influxes of immigrants, the first immediately following World War II and those who have come in recent years. Many immigrants arrived from war-torn countries of Europe, including the Dutch, Germans, Mennonites, Poles and Ukrainians. They looked to Canada to re-establish their lives. It is truly amazing what they have accomplished. Many arrived in Canada with very little money and few possessions. They struggled to find gainful employment and to learn a new language. As I grew up among them, their fierce determination and pride was a constant source of inspiration.
And Canada, the destination of choice for the Mennonites, wasn't willing to take refugees until it had demobilized its armed forces and realigned its economy to put massive numbers of discharged service personnel back into the civilian workforce.
The displaced Mennonites had another possible destination - the Mennonite colonies in Paraguay. The Mennonite Central Committee started to make arrangements to move refugees to Paraguay - as a temporary measure until Canada relented.
At the same time, in Canada, the Mennonite Brethren had instituted a Bible college in Winnipeg. It was in its second year of operation when the 2nd World War came to an end. Outwardly intended to train theologians to support the Canadian element of the Mennonite Brethren churches, it was the preparatory training for missionaries and church workers to be deployed outside Canada. It was also where two of its students, sometime in 1945, Victor Toews and Anne Peters, met.
As the M.C.C. was working to have conscripted surviving Mennonite men released from PoW camps (on the basis that they were inducted for "political" reasons and were not loyal to Germany) they also prepared a mass immigration to Paraguay.
The Mennonite Brethern churches in Paraguay had not had a "good" war. A large number of the Paraguayan Mennonites openly approved of Hitler early after his take-over of power. They felt he would bring an appropriate discipline and strengthened morality to Germany. They also hoped for citizenship in the greater Germany being touted by Hitler. Beyond the Mennonite doctrine of non-resistance, large elements of the Paraguayan Mennonite Brethren community vocally supported Hitler and tried to steer the Mennonite Brethren churches in Paraguay to make that support official. The result was a church body that was split between pro-Hitler "Voelkische" and opposition "anti-Voelkische" groups. It took the intervention of American Mennonite workers, some of whom were viewed as spies, to re-unify the Mennonite Brethren churches. Subsequent study of the matter suggested that the pro-Hitler "Voelkische" element may have been as large as 70 percent of the male members of the Paraguayan Mennonite Brethren congregation. (The method of determining this was based on contributions to papers and newsletters of the time. It was not scientific and actually proves nothing.)
It was to Paraguay, and a congregation trying to heal itself from the rifts created during WW2, that Mennonite refugees came, most with the intent to eventually find their way to Canada.
The Canadian Mennonite Brethren church dispatched workers to Paraguay to assist in the preparation. In 1947 and 1948, as refugees arrived from Europe, several North American workers became prominent in the Paraguayan communities. One of them was named Victor Toews.
The workers and preachers sent to Paraguay encountered a devastated people. The refugees, in order to qualify for immigration anywhere, had to prove to the International Refugee Organization that they were neither Soviet nor German. As difficult as that was for many, another prominent factor stood out - a huge number of the refugee families were led by women alone. The men had either been lost during the war on the side of Germany or, more commonly, had been "disappeared" into the Soviet system of labour camps and gulags, never to be heard from again. The Mennonite women fleeing the Soviet push westward through Europe then endured the institutionalized policy of the Red Army in dealing with women and girls of conquered territory - rape.
The patriarchal Mennonite church congregations were less than accommodating according to Marlene Epp, author of Women without Men: Mennonite Refugees of the Second World War. Female-led Mennonite families were viewed by relief workers as "weak" (Schwache). Further, because the women could not provide evidence of the survival or death of a long vanished husband, they were castigated by congregations for establishing relationships not sanctioned by the church.
While the work of the missionaries in Paraguay was to "fix" the many problems of refugees, (not the least of which was an ever present cynicism toward church doctrine), a primary goal was to weaken Canadian government resistance and move as many refugees as possible to Canada.
By the mid-1950s large numbers of refugees had left Paraguay for various locations in Canada, and in 1956 Victor and Anne Toews left Paraguay with their family, including a pre-school aged Victor Toews jr.
This is the family our current Public Safety minister claims had so much influence on his thinking. A missionary father who was directly involved with desperate people fleeing the ravages of war. Did the Rev. Toews suggest that the Mennonite refugees arriving from Europe were Nazis, or Communists? There's no evidence of that.
Apparently our Public Safety minister has another problem. He might speed things up and just come right out and say it. Apparently what Vic Toews learned from the experience of his parents left him with the belief that there are two classes of refugee. Those he chooses to like and those he doesn't. "Refugee status for my kind; not yours."
Sunday, March 16, 2008
Vic Toews does the "World Stage" and falls off
Geez. I wonder if Vic remembers one of the icons of conservative dogma? The Iron Lady. It brings up two things.One. Canada has always been on the world stage.
In 1982, after General Leopoldo Galtieri, leader of the military junta governing Argentina, decided to divert the Argentine population's attention from his "excesses" and invade the Falkland Islands, a flurry of diplomatic activity and meetings took place. One significant meeting was between the British "war" cabinet and a team led by US Secretary of State Alexander Haig.
At that first meeting, after the British had asked the US to intervene with Galtieri, Haig's group suggested a three-stage diplomatic effort to avert war. Part one involves an Argentine withdrawal from the Falklands. Part two, (and this is important), involves returning the Falklands to British administration but under a multi-national arrangement involving Canada, two Latin-American countries and perhaps the US.
Who was the prime minister at the time? Why, Pierre Trudeau. Why would Haig even consider Canada? Because despite our alliances we possessed that unique position on the "world stage" as an honest and reliable broker.
Did Haig, or his NSC advisers even consult Trudeau? We don't know, but one of the reasons it was even suggested is that Haig's team knew Canada would jump in if called. And Haig, despite the fact that people believe he was a consummate war-monger, was fighting both the British distrust of the Argentinians and the extremist right-wing (led by Jean Kirkpatrick) in Washington. He wanted a moderate, measured solution and the one place he knew he could go for support was Canada.
Let's move on to the second point. Thatcher wasn't buying Haig's diplomatic ideas. She didn't trust Galtieri to abide by an international agreement and in any case she had already started spooling up the national mind for a dirty little war. She made a statement which went, "If General Galtieri harms the hair on the head of one British subject... ".
Ignore for a moment that the message was more for the Soviets at the time than it was for Galtieri. Thatcher, even though it was rhetoric, made it clear that no one could violate the rule of law when it came to British subjects, no matter how far flung they may be. Period.
Back to Vic Toews and his propaganda leaflet.
Thatcher is one of the heroes of the movement conservatives. Toews should be worshiping her image.
So why is he ignoring the fact that Canada is being shoved around on the "world stage" by Mexico? Even the conservative movement rag isn't buying it.
Helena Guergis, the secretary of state for Foreign Affairs, was insistent this week that justice should be allowed to take its course in the case of Brenda Martin, the Canadian woman who has been imprisoned in Mexico for more than two years awaiting trial on money-laundering charges.Brenda Martin has been refused a proper hearing, has been denied interpreters and has been denied legal counsel. The person with whom she was supposed to have conspired for her crime, now serving a 10-year sentence in the US has sworn in writing that Brenda Martin was no way involved in his criminal activities.Yet the events of the past few days have offered more proof that justice as we know it does not exist in Mexico, a country where you are judged guilty until proven innocent. It's a tragedy for Ms. Martin that Mexican prosecutors haven't been as scrupulous about due process as the secretary of state.
The Harper government's response so far? Oh well.
It's probably worth looking at the front of Toews' leaflet.
Ah yes. The brand. It's all about one person. Nothing else and no one else matters.
H/T Kat.

