Showing posts with label creationism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label creationism. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 24, 2013

The spirit of man . . .


WINTER SOLSTICE, and the cycle of life continues: we celebrate the end of one year and the beginnings of our future and the re-birth of the world around us. That future belongs to the young, and some of them are up to the task. 

Consider 19-year-old Zack Kopplin; according to io9's article by George Dvorsky, “How 19-year-old activist Zack Kopplin is making life hell for Louisiana's creationists”, Zack's leading the battle against Christian ignorance in Louisiana. Way to go, Zackster!

Sunday, December 18, 2011

Creationism creep

Genie Scott explains how the christian conservatives are trying to sneak their way into the US school curriculum with bogus "academic freedom" laws.



As Panda's Thumb points out, it could be called "Academic Anarchy" without any loss of meaning.

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

This found its way into a scientific journal

I follow meteorological and oceanographic research as closely as I can. It's what I do. In my post-grad days, it's the only thing I did.

So I was a little confounded when I read the abstract for this bit of work funded by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR/NCAR) and the Office of Naval Research.

Then I read this:
Competing interests: The lead author has a web site, theistic-evolution.com, that addresses Christian faith and biological evolution. The Red Sea crossing is mentioned there briefly. The present study treats the Exodus 14 narrative as an interesting and ancient story of uncertain origin.
What?! The paper, supposedly scientific, is done to support some mythical bible story about Moses parting the Red Sea.

How the hell did that make it past an initial review?

Then I noticed that I wasn't the only one who had noticed. Read on at PZ Myers.

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Why do people laugh at creationists? Part 1 & 2

A couple of years ago an amateur documentary producer known as ThunderfOOt decided it was time take the garbage spewed by biblical creationists and "intelligent design" peddlers and pick apart the cherry picking they present as "science". The result was a five hour documentary done in 32 parts.

The producer never marketed it, never offered it on DVD and made no money from it. He did, however, put it on YouTube.

It's an amazing piece of work which tears the creationists' myths and they're so-called "science" to shreds. And not in a polite way. He calls them what they are. He also accuses them of wasting the time of scientists and others who, in order to ensure scientific pursuit remains scientific, find themselves having to sweep the path clear of religious mysticism.

I will be presenting ThunderfOOt's documentary over the next few weeks. I will try to give you a daily installment of two parts per day through to its end. That would be a manageable 10 minutes per day. In any case, you can always go to YouTube to find the whole series, or you can go here and watch the whole 5 hours. (I would suggest, beer, popcorn and a big screen connection if you're going to do the whole thing at once.)





Oh yes, something I should mention. There is a tendency, when one of us reality-based types exposes the BS the creationists and ID freaks peddle as "science", for the comments section to fill with over-the-top religious nuts defending their superstitious nonsense. When they don't evoke a rebuttal they turn into right-proper nasty bastards to which I think their declared Lord and Saviour might object. Go right ahead. It just adds to the exposure.

Friday, February 26, 2010

Kentucky Creationists

VANITY FAIR has a delightful article by A.A. Gill, "Roll Over, Charles Darwin!", which is his account of a visit to the Creation Museum, which he says, has been battling science and reason since 2007.

Just off a motorway, in a barren and uninspiring piece of scrub, the museum is impressively incongruous, a righteously modernist building resting in landscaped gardens filled with dinosaur topiaries. It cost $27 million and was completed in 2007. It answers the famous question about what God could have done if he had had money. This is it. Oddly, it is a conspicuously and emphatically secular construction. There is no religious symbolism. No crosses. No stained glass. No spiral campanile. It has borrowed the empirical vernacular of the enemy to wrap the literal interpretation of Genesis in the façade of a liberal art gallery or library. It is the Lamb dressed in wolf’s clothing.

The next things I noticed were the very illiberally accoutred security guards. They are absurdly over-armed, overdressed, and overweight. Perhaps the museum is concerned that armed radical atheists, maddened by the voices of reason in their confused heads, will storm in waving the periodic table, screaming, “I think, therefore I am!”

The Creation Museum isn’t really a museum at all. It’s an argument. It’s not even an argument. It’s the ammunition for an argument. It is the Word made into bullets. An armory of righteous revisionism. This whole building is devoted to the literal veracity of the first 11 chapters of Genesis: God created the world in six days, and the whole thing is no more than 6,000 years old. Everything came at once, so Tyrannosaurus rex and Noah shared a cabin. That’s an awful lot of explaining to do. This place doesn’t just take on evolution—it squares off with geology, anthropology, paleontology, history, chemistry, astronomy, zoology, biology, and good taste. It directly and boldly contradicts most -onomies and all -ologies, including most theology.

We start with the creation of the world, and of light. And there you are, immediately—Houston, we have a problem: you get light three days before you get the sun. But that’s fine—we’ve got an answer: the sun is, in fact, what God made to keep the light in. It was an afterthought, a receptacle born out of necessity.

Serendipitously, MORE INTELLIGENT LIFE, which is a fine site that is part of the Economist web enterprise, also has an article by Natasha Lennard about the institution, "Of Myths and Museums"

Inside the building’s 40-foot-high glass walls visitors are treated to a whistle-stop tour of Biblical history, arranged in a way that would not seem out of place in Disneyland. A darkened tunnel leads to a vast and verdant Garden of Eden, filled with exotic plastic flowers, peaceful creatures and pools of gentle water. A comely Adam discovers a comely Eve, whose modesty is preserved by her long, dark, synthetic mane. The garden also includes a wealth of prehistoric animals, such as a Tyrannosaurus rex, which we are told was tame and herbivorous before Adam and Eve snacked on that dastardly apple.

Dinosaurs had to have coexisted with humans, we learn, because there were no carnivores before man’s fall, and fossils show that some dinosaurs preyed on others. Therefore, the Creation Museum concludes, dinosaurs must have existed after the fall. But aren’t dinosaur-related fossils millions of years old? AiG and the museum have a handy explanation: such fossils only seem old because “organic materials are relentlessly attacked by bacteria,” so they decompose quickly. “Without the millions–of–years bias,” explains Andrew A. Snelling, the director of research at AiG in a paper published in Creation magazine, “these fossils would readily be recognized as victims of a comparatively recent event, for example, the global devastation of Noah’s Flood only about 4,500 years ago.”

If you can believe in a veggie T-Rex, you can swallow just about anything.