Some women are going to vote for Hillary 'cause she's a woman.

So says, (who else?) Bill O'Reilly. And his guest, self-proclaimed female expert, Marc Rudov.

During the March 10 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor, Bill O'Reilly hosted Marc Rudov, author of Under the Clitoral Hood: How to Crank Her Engine Without Cash, Booze, or Jumper Cables, to discuss "What is the downside of having a woman become the president of the United States?" Rudov's initial response to the question was, "You mean besides the PMS and the mood swings, right?" O'Reilly responded: "But guys have mood swings, Marc. And you know they have other control issues, as we just heard with [New York] Governor [Eliot] Spitzer and we saw with various presidents. So come on now, let's be fair." Rudov then asserted: "Well, you know, I'm joking. Of course, the main problem I have is if a woman has a female agenda. If she doesn't have a female agenda, if she just wants to be an executive for all the people, then all I care about is if she's qualified. And I have no qualms about having a female president. But if we take [Sen.] Hillary Clinton, she specifically does have a female agenda." Rudov later added: "But Hillary embodies the female agenda. She wants to be the feminist in chief. She represents women. It says so on her website. And a lot of women are voting for her because she's a woman."

Surely there is a leaked copy of this "female agenda" kicking around somewhere.

Media Matters has the transcript and the video... if you can stomach it. And this isn't the first time Rudov has complained that Hillary Clinton is a woman. He did it back in January.

On things that boggle the mind

Madison, Wisconsin law professor dabbles in Freudian analysis to provide cover fire for her own narcissistic maneuver. Sets off internet blogging storm when she declares "mission accomplished". Orders of onion rings triple at North American fast-food take-out restaurants while shipments of Kleenex™ to the basements of members of the microchip militia have caught delivery companies completely unawares.

US presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, in the spirit of NAFTA, makes a decision which would send even Freud back to the books. Jeez, couldn't she have picked an act that doesn't evoke a continuing stream of apologies from huge segments of the Canadian population? What the hell, wasn't this guy available?! Do you see what you've done?!! Sure. Go for the Canadian angle, but ferchrissakes, go downtown.