Showing posts with label abuse of authority. Show all posts
Showing posts with label abuse of authority. Show all posts

Monday, February 08, 2010

All in all, they're all just bricks in the wall

"When we grew up and went to school, there were certain teachers who would hurt the children any way they could"


So many authoritarian nitwits, so little time to blog. This kid is probably lucky they didn't taser her when she started crying. Almost as disturbing is the reaction of America's least favorite conservative law professor and box-wine sommelier (as noted by Pandagon). Obviously, the teacher cannot ignore a student writing on their desk and must instill respect for the property of others blah blah blah, but I think handcuffing and arresting a12-year-old teaches another lesson - fear your teacher! Don't step out of line! fear school!


Way to put the "Pal" in "Principal" Ms. Grant! What do you do if the kids chew gum in class, waterboard them? I was a fairly well-behaved kid in school, and my high school shenannigans tended to the bizarre and comical, rather than the destructive, but if I had a principal like this running my school, there definitely would have been major problems. It may be that by completely overreacting and responding in a way that would be considered child abuse if a parent had done it, Principal Grant may have done 12-year-old Alexa a favor and taught her a lesson she won't soon forget. Not the lesson she intended, but a lesson nonetheless: The people in charge aren't here to help you. The people in charge will abuse you any chance they get. Property is more important than people to the people in charge. The people in charge are a vicious bunch of hysterical fools more intent on showing they are in charge at all costs than actually doing their jobs.
Twelve is pretty early to learn a lesson like that, but at least there is time for her sense of idealism and trust to grow back.
I don't mean to malign all teachers and school administrators, far from it. I think teaching is a noble profession and that teachers get too little respect, too little credit and too much blame in our society. The vast majority are hardworking,nurturing souls who care about the kids they are trying to educate. Hurrah for teachers.
That said, as in any profession, there are those who have gone into it for the wrong reasons, those who have been defeated by the challenges of the job and now just coast and most dangerous of all, those who abuse their authority. In teaching, as in the police, there is no one more dangerous than a petty tyrant. Bullies suck in any line of work, but one with a badge, gun and taser who has been given a licence to hassle people is dangerous, not only for the abuses of power they commit, but for the effect it has in undermining respect for the law and police. The same is true of authoritarian principals, vice-principals, coaches and teachers who think that they are entitled to bully and abuse the children entrusted to their care. Not only do they traumatize the individual kids they "discipline," but they also destroy the trust of the other students and parents in the system. They teach kids not to ask questions, not to stand up for themselves, not to think independently. Ditto for those petty dictators who insist on enforcing ill-considered "zero-tolerance" policies to the absolute letter, even while completely ignoring the spirit of the rule. They teach kids that being tolerant, reasonable, flexible and even merciful is wrong and that the kid bringing a plastic butter knife in his lunch to spread cream cheese on his bagel has committed the same crime as a kid who brings a machine gun to class.
Principal Grant may think that by having a kid arrested and jailed for writing her desk that she is sending a message to the other kids that she and the school will not tolerate any misbehaviour, but the message the kids will take to heart is that if they are to be hung for a sheep, why not take the whole flock? If just writing on the desk gets you sent to jail, you might as well set fire to that sucker, and the classroom as well, since you are going to be treated the same way for any offense, no matter how small.

crossposted from The Woodshed




Thursday, November 26, 2009

Ineedadinnerjacket strikes again

THE LA TIMES HAS A DISTURBING REPORT: According to Alexandra Sandels in Beirut,  less than a year after authorities stormed the offices of Iranian human-rights lawyer Shirin Ebadi, taking sensitive documents and her computer, unidentified authorities have now allegedly taken the Nobel Peace Prize medal and diploma from Ebadi's bank safety deposit box, said officials in Norway, which administers the prize.

Outraged officials in Oslo say the incident is unprecedented and has sent shock waves through the Norwegian foreign ministry.

In its statement, the Norwegian foreign ministry also expressed concern over the treatment of Ebadi's husband by Iranian authorities.

They say his pension is not being paid and that his bank account has been frozen. He also was detained in Tehran earlier this fall and subsequently beaten, they said.

Grrrrrrr. The revolution cannot come soon enough. Meanwhile, I can daydream about Ineedadinnerjacket's encounter with a .50 Barrett . . . at 2 kilometers. The 700-grain Excedrin headache. John Moses B. would be so proud.

Thursday, January 10, 2008

Beyond the call of normal duty? No... Exceeded his authority.


Aha! We have a new Harperite code for Abused His/Her Authority. (Emphasis mine)
Natural Resources Minister Gary Lunn should be "commended" for his decision to re-open a nuclear reactor against the advice of the country's nuclear watchdog in order to relieve a worldwide shortage of medical isotopes, the prime minister said Thursday.

"I think the minister of natural resources, in fact all the ministers of the government who worked on this file, are to be commended for acting, frankly, beyond the normal call of duty to ensure that the Canadian medical system was not needlessly endangered by decisions made by the president of the nuclear commission," Stephen Harper said during a New Brunswick press conference.

Acting beyond the normal call of duty.

Let's be clear here. Lunn had no authority to order a nuclear reactor to be re-started. Absolutely none.

The Nuclear Safety and Control Act (1997) establishes the existence and execution of the independent non-departmental quasi-judicial body known as the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. The role of the minister responsible? To table reports to Parliament which originate at that commission.

The CNSC is answerable to Parliament; not a minister. A minister has no authority to issue orders to any quasi-judicial body.

And just in case Harper and Lunn thought they didn't know better, it's actually included in their own Privy Council Office direction for Accountable Government, Part II, section 7.

The nature of the relationship between a Minister and an administrative tribunal with independent decision-making or quasi-judicial functions is a particularly sensitive issue. Ministers must not intervene in specific decisions of those bodies. Specific guidance governing Ministers’ dealings with quasi-judicial tribunals is included in Annex E, as are guidelines on Crown corporations in Annex F.

Is that clear enough? MUST NOT INTERVENE.

What part of that does Gary Lunn not understand? In fact, it would appear Harper doesn't get it either.

Perhaps a little amplification is in order. From the PCO Accountable Government Annex E - Dealings With Quasi-Judicial Tribunals:
Ministers and Secretaries of State shall not intervene, or appear to intervene, on behalf of any person or entity, with quasi-judicial tribunals on any matter before them that requires a decision in their quasi-judicial capacity, unless otherwise authorized by law.
And...
Ministers, Secretaries of State and their staff cannot intervene on behalf of any person or entity with a quasi-judicial agency on any matter before it that requires a decision in its quasi-judicial capacity.
Is that now clear enough?

So, Gary Lunn violated the Privy Council Office's own rules regarding the conduct of ministers. He did so with certain knowledge of his actions.

In any other government Gary Lunn would be out on his ass. Gary Lunn's issue of his December 10, 2007 Directive to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission Regarding the Health of Canadians was not lawful and possessed no force. In fact, it was a violation of the rules of Accountable Government as issued by the Privy Council Office. In short, Gary Lunn far exceeded his authority in attempting to interfere with the CNSC.

Lunn's further action, a letter to CNSC president Linda Keen, serves to exemplify his total disregard for the rules governing the behaviour of ministers of the Crown. Lunn threatened to fire Keen for behaving exactly as she is expected to behave as the head of an independent non-departmental quasi-judicial commission.

But to Harper, this is now beyond the normal call of duty.

Which goes to prove Harper doesn't make a differentiation between duty and limits on authority or policy and politics.

POGGE has taken the time to explain why.

And Harper is a liar.